From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54701)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Yxt4G-0004Mj-Iz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:21:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Yxt4F-0003W6-M8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 04:21:32 -0400
Message-ID: <5566D000.3030101@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:21:20 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1432711146-28405-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<556590B1.2040405@redhat.com>
	<20150528014615.GA22609@dhcp-14-238.nay.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150528014615.GA22609@dhcp-14-238.nay.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] aio: Don't poll ioeventfd in
 nested aio_poll()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>



On 28/05/2015 03:46, Fam Zheng wrote:
> The main context uses iohandler and aio_dispatch, neither calls
> aio_set_dispatching(). However, if we have [2], they can be changed to
> aio_poll(), then would this idea work?

I think it's a bad idea to handle aio_poll for context B in a different
way, just because you have an outer aio_poll for context A...

Paolo