From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxv2l-0002g1-I8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:28:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxv2i-0006Kd-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:28:07 -0400 Received: from e28smtp07.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.7]:54406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yxv2h-0006KF-KF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 06:28:04 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp07.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:58:00 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EF23940048 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:57:58 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (d28av03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.65]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t4SARvpW54657138 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:57:57 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av03.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t4S9gSFi001888 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 15:12:28 +0530 Message-ID: <5566EDAA.7010103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:27:54 +0800 From: tu bo MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1432524657-3113-1-git-send-email-tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150526115555.GG24077@noname.str.redhat.com> <556699C5.2030306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150528120124.036c4178@thh440s> In-Reply-To: <20150528120124.036c4178@thh440s> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Kevin Wolf , mreitz@redhat.com, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com Hi Thomas: thanks a lot. I'll remove 'RFC' from the subject line and drop the backslash according to Max's advice, and create v10. On 05/28/2015 06:01 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > Hi Tu Bo! > > On Thu, 28 May 2015 12:29:57 +0800 > tu bo wrote: > >> Hi Kevin: >> >> On 05/26/2015 07:55 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > ... >>> Is this still an RFC series, as the subject indicates, or is it meant >>> for inclusion? >> This is my first task for qemu which I took over from Xiao Guang Chen, >> and I'm not sure if I understand it well. Does 'RFC' mean 'Reference >> for Candidate'? please correct me if I'm wrong. If other actions I >> need to take, please let me know. > RFC means "Request for comments". You put it into a patch title if you > want to get some comments about your patches, but don't consider them > good enough for inclusion yet. See also the patch submission guideline > for details: http://qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch > >> Anyway, this patch series is final version. thanks > I that case the title should normally not include "RFC" anymore. > > Regards, > Thomas >