From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yye4c-0004x9-MV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:33:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yye4Y-00041G-Lx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:33:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:36931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yye4Y-000418-Eo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 06:32:58 -0400 Received: by wifw1 with SMTP id w1so51196285wif.0 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 03:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <556991D0.6000708@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 12:32:48 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2816EEF2-0256-4B49-8811-74EFB3016CD4@livius.net> <556848A3.6010905@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] extensions to the -m memory option List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite Cc: Liviu Ionescu , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" On 30/05/2015 11:55, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > I think the same is true of NOR. NOR is sized according to the capacity of its backing file, at least in the PC case. Paolo