From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40225) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzP3k-0006rP-EA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:43:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzP3h-0008N3-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:43:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzP3g-0008Mx-SB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <556C535B.60307@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 14:43:07 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150531181048.GC5268@redhat.com> <556C046B.9070704@redhat.com> <20150601092645-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <556C1F63.1090605@redhat.com> <20150601121908-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <556C3757.7080603@redhat.com> <20150601124604-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <556C417D.4050707@redhat.com> <20150601143447-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <556C5275.7010702@redhat.com> <20150601144015-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150601144015-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 4/4] fw_cfg: insert fw_cfg file blobs via qemu cmdline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com, "Gabriel L. Somlo" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gsomlo@gmail.com, kraxel@redhat.com, Laszlo Ersek On 01/06/2015 14:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 01/06/2015 14:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> I'm sorry - I don't understand. It's easy to do the right thing. Just >>> add the opt prefix. Why insist on user doing the right thing, and punish >>> violations with failing at random? >>> >>> If it's useful for developers somehow, add a config flag for that. >> >> You've already been explained that config flags are not an answer. > > Oh then just #define FW_CFG_USER_PREFIX "opt/". > > Developers can edit that to "" if they want to play. Shall we agree to just let Gerd decide since he's handling these patches? Paolo