From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzjXB-0001Ah-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzjX8-0002Y9-M2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:35:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]:36076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzjX8-0002Xw-G3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:34:58 -0400 Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so136381430wgb.3 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 03:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <556D86CD.3060404@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:34:53 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <556CAE14.6010209@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 03/34] Makefile.target: Introduce arch-obj List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson Cc: Peter Maydell , Peter Crosthwaite , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , Peter Crosthwaite , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6Q=?= =?UTF-8?B?cmJlcg==?= On 02/06/2015 11:40, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > > Is arch-obj-n added to obj-y somewhere I'm missing? Such an inclusion would > > seem to tidy some of the lines above... > > No it's not. I didn't even know that was ok. Indeed it's not a great idea, because such objects would be split between arch-obj- (no "n") and arch-obj-n. This is why we have lnot. Paolo