From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sandhya Kumar <insatiablecuriousity07@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] On x86 MMU modes
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:01:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556EA649.3010805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEqbB46uMYv3heY2wxYM-GbVnhFfaF_Xo=y3QoSpa76csy23FA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/06/2015 08:51, Sandhya Kumar wrote:
> As per my understanding (which matches versions prior to this commit),
> we generally maintain only two TLBs [one for kernel and one for user] in
> x86 ISA for caching address translations. With this commit we seem to
> have three modes of MMU, although only two will be actually used (either
> KSMAP or KNOSMAP).
This is not accurate. If AC=0, data accesses from the kernel use
KNOSMAP, but implicit accesses (e.g. reads of the IDT) use KSMAP.
> Is my claim valid ? Why cannot those two original
> modes serve the purpose and why is the separation (of KNOMAP and KSMAP)
> needed?
Because the QEMU TLB just has a single bit for "is this page readable".
In supervisor mode and with SMAP enabled, this changes depending on the
value of the AC bit. Without separate TLBs for KNOSMAP/KSMAP, you would
have to flush the TLB on every CLAC or STAC instruction.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-03 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 6:51 [Qemu-devel] On x86 MMU modes Sandhya Kumar
2015-06-03 7:01 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-06-03 7:41 ` Sandhya Kumar
2015-06-03 7:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 8:07 ` Sandhya Kumar
2015-06-03 8:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 9:24 ` Sandhya Kumar
2015-06-03 9:36 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-06 7:36 ` Sandhya Kumar
2015-06-06 22:34 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-08 2:51 ` Sandhya Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556EA649.3010805@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=insatiablecuriousity07@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).