From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1yxN-0001l8-2q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:27:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1yxI-0000wE-4Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:27:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1yxI-0000va-0J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:27:16 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADCE119F275 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5575B497.9030808@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 18:28:23 +0300 From: Gal Hammer MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1430133591-6197-1-git-send-email-ghammer@redhat.com> <1430133591-6197-5-git-send-email-ghammer@redhat.com> <556F2D51.2000203@redhat.com> <55759BB8.3010604@redhat.com> <55759C1B.7000905@redhat.com> <55759E0A.3090102@redhat.com> <55759EC2.5090802@redhat.com> <20150608135854.GC19157@redhat.com> <20150608165951-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <5575B20B.9000502@redhat.com> <20150608171921-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150608171921-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V15 4/5] i386: add a Virtual Machine Generation ID device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 08/06/2015 18:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 08/06/2015 17:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> Are there applications that would actually use this? For microsoft this >>> seems to be mostly driven by ActiveDirectory needs. >>> It seems quite possible that applications solve the problem >>> differently on Linux. >> >> I'm not aware of a different solution to the problem on Linux. >> >> Paolo > > Adding it by default for everyone still seems too aggressive. > We had a ton of pain with pvpanic exactly because of a > similar "can't hurt" approach. > > I think a better approach would be to merge the code in qemu, > merge a linux driver. Once that's available, and some apps use it, > enabling it by default will seem more reasonable. > You should not enable it by default. It should be left for the management system to decide. QEmu by itself can't follow rules/spec on when to change the UUID. Gal.