From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56927)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>) id 1Z28R0-0003Yh-QY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 21:34:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>) id 1Z28Qv-0003wf-PJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 21:34:34 -0400
Message-ID: <5576428A.4030603@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:34:02 +0800
From: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1431477807-12220-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
	<555AEA20.3090501@huawei.com> <556C0B7A.3070601@huawei.com>
	<20150601122437-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<556C429F.3070802@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <556C429F.3070802@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] pci/isa: QOMify
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-trivial@nongnu.org" <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>, "mjt@tls.msk.ru >>
	Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com

On 2015/6/1 19:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/06/2015 12:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> Hi, Michael, Paolo
>>>>
>>>> Can you please ack or review those patches?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -Gonglei
>> I think this belongs in the QOM tree, not mine.
> 
> Recently Gerd at least has taken similar patches, so I guess it belongs
> all over the place, including Xen, KVM and PC trees.
> 
> Let's say it belongs in qemu-trivial (CCed)...
> 
OK.

/mjt, what's your opinion? Thanks

Regards,
-Gonglei