From: "Alex Züpke" <alexander.zuepke@hs-rm.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU ARM SMP: IPI delivery delayed until next main loop event // how to improve IPI latency?
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:07:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557EEA46.10507@hs-rm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_yNS1jQugH9e=0_e_TabPZ83TnUPUPtxbRnHGLr5Jv0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Am 15.06.2015 um 17:04 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 12 June 2015 at 17:38, Alex Züpke <alexander.zuepke@hs-rm.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm benchmarking some IPI (== inter-processor-interrupt) synchronization stuff of my custom kernel on QEMU ARM (qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a15 -smp 2) and ran into the following problem: pending IPIs are delayed until the QEMU main loop receives an event (for example the timer interrupt expires or I press a key on the console).
>>
>> The following timing diagram tries to show this:
>>
>> CPU #0 CPU #1
>> ====== ======
>> ... other stuff ... WFI (wait for interrupt, like x86 "HLT")
>> send SGI in MPCore
>> polls for completeness
>> <time passes ...>
>> polls ...
>> <... and passes ...>
>> still polls ...
>> <... and passes ...>
>> still polls ...
>> <... and passes ...>
>>
>>
>> <timer interrupt expires>
>> <now QEMU switches to CPU #1>
>> receives IPI
>> signals completeness
>> WFI
>> <QEMU switches to CPU #0>
>> polling done
>> process timer interrupt
>> ...
>
> Does your polling loop have a YIELD insn in it? We (and hardware)
> can use that as a hint that you're busy-looping and we should
> try doing something else. (QEMU doesn't implement that for A32/T32
> yet, but we should; we already do on A64.)
Yes, I should be yielding here, but SEV isn't implemented.
Probably the notification should be done there as well.
Best regards
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 16:38 [Qemu-devel] QEMU ARM SMP: IPI delivery delayed until next main loop event // how to improve IPI latency? Alex Züpke
2015-06-12 18:03 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 14:44 ` Alex Züpke
2015-06-15 14:51 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 15:05 ` Alex Züpke
2015-06-15 18:41 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 18:58 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 20:03 ` Alex Zuepke
2015-06-16 10:33 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-16 10:59 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-16 11:11 ` Alex Züpke
2015-06-16 11:53 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-16 12:21 ` Alex Züpke
2015-06-19 15:53 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-23 7:31 ` Frederic Konrad
2015-06-23 8:09 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-23 8:33 ` Frederic Konrad
2015-06-23 18:15 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-25 17:13 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 15:04 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 15:07 ` Alex Züpke [this message]
2015-06-15 15:18 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 15:36 ` Alex Züpke
2015-06-15 15:49 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-15 16:12 ` Alex Züpke
2015-06-15 21:39 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-19 16:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-19 17:25 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557EEA46.10507@hs-rm.de \
--to=alexander.zuepke@hs-rm.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).