From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Aurelien Jarno" <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
"Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dma/rc4030: do multiple calls to address_space_rw when doing DMA transfers
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:33:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558130CA.4030502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150616174846.GA17031@aurel32.net>
On 16/06/2015 19:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The code assumes that if you don't have an IOMMU, the address range in
> the underlying memory region is linear.
I think this is exactly what Peter Crosthwaite's infamous :) "exec:
Respect as_translate_internal length clamp" patch was trying to fix.
However, address_space_translate_internal uses section->mr->size instead
of section->size. I'll post a patch once I'm through the email deluge
from 1 week of absence.
If I read correctly the patch that introduced address_space_translate,
the bug has always been there.
> One fix would be to adjust the
> length even without IOMMU. That would have some performance impact
> though, so maybe we want to make this assumption clear and always use an
> IOMMU in that case.
I don't think there would be a performance impact, except in buggy cases
such as the one Hervé is fixing.
Paolo
>>> I therefore wonder if
>>> you therefore shouldn't model this DMA translation tables by using IOMMU
>>> ops instead of subregions.
>>>
>> No, in my opinion, that's an implementation detail. Paolo said that it was OK:
>> "Both are okay. The IOMMU makes address space changes faster; your
>> scheme is basically a form of caching, it trades update performance for
>> improved translation performance."
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-03/msg05486.html
>
> It seems wrong with the current code. And if we fix the bug by adjusting
> the length, the above sentence about the performances might becomes
> wrong
>
> Aurelien.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 20:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dma/rc4030: do multiple calls to address_space_rw when doing DMA transfers Hervé Poussineau
2015-06-11 23:30 ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-06-15 20:44 ` Hervé Poussineau
2015-06-16 17:48 ` Aurelien Jarno
2015-06-17 8:33 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-06-17 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-17 18:31 ` Hervé Poussineau
2015-06-17 19:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558130CA.4030502@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=hpoussin@reactos.org \
--cc=leon.alrae@imgtec.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).