From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] RFC cdrom in own thread?
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:03:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55825F17.3060205@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150617083539.GA4202@noname.str.redhat.com>
Am 17.06.2015 um 10:35 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 16.06.2015 um 17:34 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
>>> I wonder how difficult it would be to have the IDE CDROM run in its own
>>> thread?
>>> We usually have ISOs mounted on an NFS share as CDROM. Problem: If the NFS
>>> Share
>>> goes down, it takes down monitor, qmp, vnc etc. with it.
>>>
>>> Maybe its already possible to do this via cmdline args?
>>>
>>> Any ideas, comments?
>> If QEMU hangs in the read/write/flush/discard code path due to NFS
>> downtime it is a bug.
>>
>> QEMU is expected to hang in open/reopen because those are performed in
>> a blocking fashion.
>>
>> Which of these cases applies to what you are seeing? Maybe it can be fixed.
> Don't forget bdrv_drain_all(), which is called a lot by the monitor. So
> no matter what you do (and this includes moving to a thread as in a
> hypothetical "ATAPI dataplane"), you end up with a hang sooner or later.
I will have a look where qemu hangs. The problem exists with an NFS share
mounted by the kernel and also with libnfs. So it might be a bdrv_drain_all.
I regularly query info block and info blockstats. Do these commands always
call bdrv_drain_all()?.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <55803637.3060607@kamp.de>
2015-06-16 15:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] RFC cdrom in own thread? Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-17 8:35 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-06-18 6:03 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2015-06-18 6:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-06-18 6:39 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-18 6:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-18 7:03 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-18 7:12 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-18 7:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-06-18 8:30 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-18 8:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-06-18 9:29 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-18 9:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-18 9:53 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-19 13:14 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-22 9:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-22 13:09 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-22 21:54 ` John Snow
2015-06-23 6:36 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-14 13:43 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-14 14:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-08-14 14:21 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-14 14:45 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-15 19:02 ` Peter Lieven
2015-06-18 10:17 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55825F17.3060205@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).