From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5qVG-0005iR-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:14:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5qVC-0000wr-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:14:18 -0400 Received: from icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au ([203.59.1.155]:51938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5qVC-0000vN-0U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 03:14:14 -0400 Message-ID: <5583C183.2000506@uclinux.org> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:15:15 +1000 From: Greg Ungerer MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5583A1E3.302@uclinux.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] m68k orphaned? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" Hi Peter, On 19/06/15 15:53, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see in the MAINTAINERS file that pretty much everything related >> to the m68k architecture is listed as "Orphan". >> >> I have some patches that have been around for quite a while (posted >> here twice) to fix some issues with the ColdFire support. >> [See https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-08/msg03224.html] >> > > I found a 3 patch series and did a review. I see RTH put and RB to > patch 2 so I skipped over that. > >> They are still relevant, still apply, and are still needed. >> Does anyone have any suggestions how I can get them pushed into >> mainline qemu? >> > > It suggests that you are the closest thing we have to a maintainer. > You could try sending a PULL as there is no submaintainer that is > going to actively pick this up. The other alternative is the trivial > patches queue, although they are a little non-trivial due to > functional change. Thanks for the advice. Do I send the request to Peter Maydell? I don't currently have a public git tree for this, can I just send the patches? I can always set up a git hub tree if that is a must. Regards Greg