From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
Cc: Leonid Shatz <leonid.shatz@ravellosystems.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Idan Brown <idan.brown@ravellosystems.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] pci: Don't register a specialized 'config_write' if default behavior is intended
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 11:20:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558673C2.1000909@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150617221758.529fae93@pixies>
On 06/17/2015 10:17 PM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:37:18 +0300, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com wrote:
>> BTW, did you notice a bug here? If yes, can you elaborate?
>
> No, not a direct bug.
> We noticed this while working on related code areas.
>
> There's some history behind this.
>
> In 95d6580 'msi: Invoke msi/msix_write_config from PCI core', the calls
> to msi[x]_write_config have been added into pci_default_write_config,
> and many specialized 'config_write' methods have been eliminated.
>
> However there was a bug in 95d6580 - the values written to msi/msix
> were always 0.
> This was recently fixed in d7efb7e
> 'pci: avoid losing config updates to MSI/MSIX cap regs'
Got it.
>
> I assume that device authors were either (1) unware of the
> generalization, thus kept invoking msi[x]_write_config explicitly, or
> (2) trying to overcome the "lost writes".
>
> Anyway, I'm no PCI expert here, but I assume the side-effect invoking
> msi[x]_write_config twice (explicitly from the specialized config_write,
> then implicitly from pci_default_write_config) isn't desired.
Of course.
>
> Meaning, the suggested patch follows the spirit of 95d6580.
> Let me know if my analysis is flawed.
Thank you for the patch, you are completely right.
My 'Reviewed-by' tag is there, I think Michael, the PCI
maintainer, will take it shortly.
Thanks,
Marcel
>
> Regards,
> Shmulik
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-21 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 8:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] pci: Don't register a specialized 'config_write' if default behavior is intended Shmulik Ladkani
2015-06-17 9:36 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-17 9:37 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-06-17 19:17 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-06-21 8:20 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2015-06-21 8:28 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-06-17 18:46 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2015-06-21 8:16 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558673C2.1000909@gmail.com \
--to=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=idan.brown@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=knut.omang@oracle.com \
--cc=leonid.shatz@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).