From: Frederic Konrad <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 4 CPUs with vexpress is slow?
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:10:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558887D2.8070009@greensocs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9b4KLQ62_C850bVHZXLpNVmK6cn6A0G-n8U4ht6GMQyQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 22/06/2015 22:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 June 2015 at 19:18, Frederic Konrad <fred.konrad@greensocs.com> wrote:
>> Testing MTTCG patch-set performance I found strange slowness with _upstream_
>> qemu (46bca5404b08201bb9df1ac32bc88fc7e6db1f74).
>>
>> Basically booting a vexpress-a15 with "-smp 4" takes approximately forever
>> if I use a
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb (2x A15) dtb and 39 secs if I hack this dtb to
>> have 4 CPUs.
> Wait, so if you change the dtb it boots in a non-infinite time,
> but MTTCG boots both dtbs?
Yes MTTCG boots both dtbs.
>> This is definitely strange because if I use "-smp 2" with the same guest
>> image it takes
>> only 4 secs. And MTTCG patch-set seems to fix the issue as it boot in 6 secs
>> with
>> "-smp 4".
>>
>> Is that a known issue or maybe it's my guest (linux 3.13.5)?
> Dunno. I basically never run with SMP configs because they're
> always slower than uniprocessor... Does your kernel boot on
> KVM? It may be that it's configured to assume 2xSMP somehow,
> given the h/w we're modelling here is 2xSMP.
>
> Important question: when you boot this config, does /proc/cpuinfo
> say you have two cores booted, or all four? If we've ended up with
> the other two cores in the config spinning then that would explain
> why MTTCG is doing better here, but it's not a very interesting
> config to try to optimise :-)
All four cores are in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> There is an issue where IPIs may be inefficient:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-06/msg03824.html
> but I'd expect that to merely slow things down a bit, not send
> the boot time off to infinity.
This is definitely a bug :
Seems that removing "--nographic" option removes the problem it just
boots as per
normal..
Fred
>
> -- PMM
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-22 18:18 [Qemu-devel] 4 CPUs with vexpress is slow? Frederic Konrad
2015-06-22 20:57 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-22 22:10 ` Frederic Konrad [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558887D2.8070009@greensocs.com \
--to=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).