From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 1/4] cpu: Add wrapper to the set-pc() hook
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 18:21:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558C2A8A.8070202@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-mtBoZ5-8XRcGspvXt9RCuRp2yEumJj8EJVSSmK+8q0g@mail.gmail.com>
Am 25.06.2015 um 13:21 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 25 June 2015 at 12:12, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 24.06.2015 um 21:11 schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 24 June 2015 at 19:09, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> + g_assert(cc->set_pc != NULL);
>>>> + cc->set_pc(cpu, addr);
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Do we need this assert? If it would have fired
>>> then we'll just crash immediately calling the null pointer,
>>> so it's not like it's guarding against a more subtle failure
>>> at a later point...
>>
>> There seemed uncertainty whether all corner cases of the 17 targets
>> implement set_pc for all subclasses. By my reading, g_assert() calls
>> g_assertion_message_expr(), which is marked G_GNUC_NORETURN - and I
>> assume it to abort after printing the message, raising a signal and
>> either exiting the process or falling back to an attached debugger.
>>
>> It may be unnecessary, but I don't see it calling the null pointer here.
>
> What I mean is:
> * with the assert, QEMU will die in this function if cc->set_pc
> is NULL, in an easily debuggable way
> * without the assert, QEMU will still die in this function if
> cc->set_pc is NULL, in an easily debuggable way
>
> So the assert doesn't hurt, but it doesn't really gain anything IMHO.
> Assertions are most useful when they turn something that would be
> a really confusing failure much later in execution into an easily
> debuggable crash earlier on, I think.
>
> Still, this is a very minor thing, so it's a personal taste/style
> question, as you say. You can leave the assert in or remove it,
> whichever you prefer.
Okay, dropping the assertion:
diff --git a/include/qom/cpu.h b/include/qom/cpu.h
index e7ee6c6..5db1ea3 100644
--- a/include/qom/cpu.h
+++ b/include/qom/cpu.h
@@ -610,7 +610,6 @@ static inline void cpu_set_pc(CPUState *cpu, vaddr addr)
{
CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
- g_assert(cc->set_pc != NULL);
cc->set_pc(cpu, addr);
}
Cheers,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-25 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-24 3:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 0/4] qom-cpu: Wrap set_pc hook and use in bootloaders Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 3:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 1/4] cpu: Add wrapper to the set-pc() hook Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 18:09 ` Andreas Färber
2015-06-24 19:11 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-25 11:12 ` Andreas Färber
2015-06-25 11:21 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-25 16:21 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2015-06-24 3:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 2/4] gdbstub: Use cpu_set_pc() helper Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 3:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 3/4] arm: boot: Use cpu_set_pc() Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 18:22 ` Andreas Färber
2015-06-24 18:26 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 19:13 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-24 3:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 4/4] microblaze: " Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 18:00 ` Andreas Färber
2015-06-24 18:29 ` Andreas Färber
2015-06-25 2:08 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-24 18:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v3 0/4] qom-cpu: Wrap set_pc hook and use in bootloaders Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558C2A8A.8070202@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).