From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9e1Y-00084D-Ot for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:43:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9e1V-0005YH-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:43:20 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:61609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9e1U-0005Xm-Ud for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:43:17 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.39] ([82.212.23.167]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lv6YQ-1Z1MW11S1y-010Plj for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 20:43:15 +0200 Message-ID: <559191C6.5050308@rdsoftware.de> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 20:43:18 +0200 From: Erik Rull MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Best HMI Performance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Hi all, which SDL(2) / XWindows Performance is the best at which graphics card type (e.g. Cirrus or Std VGA) on the guest? Is there a table with some reference benchmarks? Thanks a lot. Best regards, Erik