From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUYtJ-0002lz-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:15:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUYl7-0003ZS-OT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:06:45 -0500 Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com ([212.186.127.180]:26120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUYl5-0003Sm-Iy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 10:06:39 -0500 References: <20181205110131.23049-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <87a7lkuptr.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> From: Dominik Csapak Message-ID: <5592d444-4527-89b8-4a0a-f32c6b5beb69@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:06:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a7lkuptr.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] qapi: return ShutdownCause for events List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com On 12/5/18 1:21 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Dominik Csapak writes: > >> This series improves the QMP SHUTDOWN and RESET events by adding >> the ShutdownCause as additional parameter and splitting >> the HOST_QMP reason into HOST_QMP_QUIT and HOST_QMP_SYSTEM_RESET >> to be able to detect the difference between them when using '--no-reboot' >> >> this is an alternative to my previous patches[1][2] which >> added an exit-script/added a 'reset' argument to the events >> >> 1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg00697.html >> 2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg01271.html > > Next time, please add the Reviewed-bys you got for the previous version > to your commit messages, unless the commits changed enough to warrant > another round of review. Yes of course, sorry for that. Thank you again for the review. > > For the record, series again > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster > >