From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC51K-0003fM-PY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:57:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC51G-0001Is-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:57:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]:36575) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZC51F-0001In-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:57:06 -0400 Received: by qgeg89 with SMTP id g89so67533452qge.3 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 04:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson References: <20150706082535.11980.88013.stgit@PASHA-ISP> <20150706082600.11980.88549.stgit@PASHA-ISP> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <559A6D0D.1070308@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:57:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150706082600.11980.88549.stgit@PASHA-ISP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 04/11] target-i386: introduce new raise_exception functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pavel Dovgalyuk , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rth7680@gmail.com, leon.alrae@imgtec.com, agraf@suse.de, aurelien@aurel32.net On 07/06/2015 09:26 AM, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > #if 0 > -#define raise_exception_err(env, a, b) \ > +#define raise_exception_err(env, a, b, c) \ > do { \ > qemu_log("raise_exception line=%d\n", __LINE__); \ > - (raise_exception_err)(env, a, b); \ > + (raise_exception_err)(env, a, b, c); \ > } while (0) > #endif > This change wouldn't compile. That said, I'm ok simply deleting the whole if 0 block. I think keeping it around is silly. r~