Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V6 02/18] replace spinlock by QemuMutex.

[Frederic Konrad <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>]

On 07/07/2015 14:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 07/07/2015 13:48, Frederic Konrad wrote:
>>>> this eventually ends up doing a tb_lock on the find_slow path which IIRC
>>>> is when might end up doing the actual code generation.
>>> Up to this point, system emulation is using the BQL for everything.  I
>>> guess things change later.
>> Actually we use tb_lock to protect all the tb related structure such as
>> TBContext etc.. Is it better to use the global lock for this?
> No, on the contrary.  But using the BQL is the status as of patch 2, so
> it's okay to keep the #ifdefs.  Thanks for confirming that it changes
> later in the patch.
>
> Paolo
In fact I changed nothing in patch 2 except abstracting out the #ifdef from
spinlock_t and using qemu_mutex (pthread_t on linux) instead of spinlock_t.
The only reason for that is only to use tb_lock for both user and system 
mode.

And yes as it's the first patch tb_lock is not used in this step except 
in the user
code.

Thanks,
Fred