From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 1/4] block: add BlockLimits.max_iov field
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:39:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559DFAE6.1020005@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436369462-24252-2-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 08.07.2015 um 17:30 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> The maximum number of struct iovec elements depends on the
> BlockDriverState. The raw-posix protocol has a maximum of IOV_MAX but
> others could have different values.
>
> Instead of assuming raw-posix and hardcoding IOV_MAX in several places,
> put the limit into BlockLimits.
>
> Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> Peter Lieven: I think the SCSI LUN level does not have a maximum
> scatter-gather segments constraint. That is probably only at the HBA
> level. CCed you anyway in case you think block/iscsi.c should set the
> max_iov field.
libiscsi will send the iovec array straight to readv and writev to
read/write from the TCP socket. So we need IOV_MAX here as well.
>
> Kevin: The default is now INT_MAX. This means non-raw-posix users will
> now be able to merge more requests than before. They were limited to
> IOV_MAX previously. This could expose limits in other BlockDrivers
> which we weren't aware of...
Why rise the default to INT_MAX and not leave it at IOV_MAX?
Is there any case where we except that much iovectors coming in?
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 15:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 0/4] block: replace IOV_MAX with BlockLimits.max_iov Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-08 15:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 1/4] block: add BlockLimits.max_iov field Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-09 4:39 ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2015-07-09 9:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-08 15:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 2/4] block-backend: add blk_get_max_iov() Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-08 15:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 3/4] block: replace IOV_MAX with BlockLimits.max_iov Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-08 15:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5 4/4] block/mirror: replace IOV_MAX with blk_get_max_iov() Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559DFAE6.1020005@kamp.de \
--to=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).