qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:04:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559E714F.1080505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559E304B.4090706@redhat.com>



On 09/07/2015 10:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> > 
>> > Perhaps KVM could simply hide memory above the limit (i.e. treat it as
>> > MMIO), and the BIOS could remove RAM above the limit from the e820
>> > memory map?
> I'd prefer to leave the guest firmware*s* out of this... :)
> 
> E820 is a legacy BIOS concept. In OVMF we'd have to hack the memory
> resource descriptor HOBs (which in turn control the DXE memory space
> map, which in turn controls the UEFI memory map). Those HOBs are
> currently based on what the CMOS reports about the RAM available under
> and above 4GB.
> 
> It's pretty complex already (will get more complex with SMM support),
> and TBH, for working around such an obscure issue, I wouldn't like to
> complicate it even further...
> 
> After all, this is a host platform limitation. The solution should be to
> either move to a more capable host, or do it in software (disable EPT).

The reason I mentioned the firmware is because you could in principle
have the same issue on real hardware - say putting 128 GB on your
laptop.  The firmware should cope with it.

If OVMF does not use etc/e820, it can instead hack the values it reads
from CMOS, bounding them according to the CPUID value.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 22:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width Bandan Das
2015-07-09  7:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  9:27   ` Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 10:03     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 19:11       ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 19:30         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  7:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09  8:26   ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 13:04     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-09 19:22       ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 12:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 19:25   ` Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559E714F.1080505@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).