From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDBw6-0001Fw-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:32:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDBw1-0006c7-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:32:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDBw0-0006bz-VA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:32:17 -0400 References: <1436426122-12276-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <559E77DD.4060501@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:32:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1436426122-12276-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] target-i386 addressing cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/07/2015 09:15, Richard Henderson wrote: > This is a revival of a patch set I posted in 2013. At the time > Paolo had some comments on the keystone patch, and I didn't have > time to address them. I've since made several revisions, and I > think the patchset is in good shape, but I've lost those original > comments. > > Anyway, I'm reviving this now because I've got another patchset > that depends on this cleanup. I couldn't find those comments either in my mailbox(es). Paolo