From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34819) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZESpz-00055X-O8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:47:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZESpw-0006ZD-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:47:19 -0400 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=50121 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZESpv-0006Xr-Ta for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:47:16 -0400 Message-ID: <55A31855.3020202@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:45:57 +0800 From: Zhu Guihua MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20150624132858.GA30955@vader> <558CC907.2020208@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150709142546.GB20671@vader> In-Reply-To: <20150709142546.GB20671@vader> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] cpu: add i386 cpu hot remove support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, anshul.makkar@profitbricks.com, chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On 07/09/2015 10:25 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11=37=43AM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote: >> Hi, >> On 06/24/2015 09:28 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: >>> Hello Zhu, >>> >>> Are you still working on this feature? Could you provide a rebased >>> version of this series? >> Sorry for late reply. >> >> Yes, we are still working on this feature. >> >> I have updated my github, you can get the rebased version from it. >> >> https://github.com/zhuguihua/qemu.git cpu-hotplug > Hi, thanks a lot for rebasing it. I didn't have time to test it, though. > I appologise. > > Regarding your branch, your plan is to stick with device_del and > object_del interface? Yeah, we will only stick with device_del interface. There is no need to use object_del interface for cpu hot remove. Thanks, Zhu