From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEetZ-0000Wu-MK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:39:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEetX-0001vk-02 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:39:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEetW-0001vA-QU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:39:46 -0400 References: <553DDD8D.6050602@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <55A3B2E2.9060301@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <55A3CBCE.4000606@redhat.com> <55A3CD5A.9020308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <55A3CDAE.8070209@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:39:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55A3CD5A.9020308@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] libcacard: cac_is_cac_card? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel On 13/07/2015 16:38, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> > If it's not defined, its mention in libcacard.syms has no effect and the >> > references can be removed. > That's two statements. First statement - its mention in .syms has no > effect - is a bit wrong. I found it _because_ this mention has some > effect. In particular, when building it on Debian the package system > complains that it can't find the symbol to be exported. Oh, interesting. It has no effect *on the ABI*, though, right? Paolo > But okay, I'll just remove it from the .syms file.