From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
qemu-devl <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: remove virtio queues if the guest doesn't support multiqueue
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:41:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A60EAA.10205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A60810.30306@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 07/15/2015 03:13 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> On 07/15/2015 02:59 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 07/15/2015 02:23 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> commit da51a335 adds all queues in .realize(). But if the
>>> guest doesn't support multiqueue, we forget to remove them. And
>>> we cannot handle the ctrl vq corretly. The guest will hang.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Thanks for the patch, some questions, see below.
>>
>>> ---
>>> hw/net/virtio-net.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>> index e3c2db3..658806a 100644
>>> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>> @@ -1306,9 +1306,62 @@ static void virtio_net_tx_bh(void *opaque)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void virtio_net_add_queue(VirtIONet *n, int index)
>>> +{
>>> + VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
>>> +
>>> + n->vqs[index].rx_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 256, virtio_net_handle_rx);
>>> + if (n->net_conf.tx && !strcmp(n->net_conf.tx, "timer")) {
>>> + n->vqs[index].tx_vq =
>>> + virtio_add_queue(vdev, 256, virtio_net_handle_tx_timer);
>>> + n->vqs[index].tx_timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL,
>>> + virtio_net_tx_timer,
>>> + &n->vqs[index]);
>>> + } else {
>>> + n->vqs[index].tx_vq =
>>> + virtio_add_queue(vdev, 256, virtio_net_handle_tx_bh);
>>> + n->vqs[index].tx_bh = qemu_bh_new(virtio_net_tx_bh, &n->vqs[index]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + n->vqs[index].tx_waiting = 0;
>>> + n->vqs[index].n = n;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void virtio_net_change_num_queues(VirtIONet *n, int new_max_queues)
>>> +{
>>> + VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
>>> + int old_num_queues = virtio_get_num_queues(vdev);
>>> + int new_num_queues = new_max_queues * 2 + 1;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + assert(old_num_queues >= 3);
>>> + assert(old_num_queues % 2 == 1);
>>> +
>>> + if (old_num_queues == new_num_queues) {
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Remove ctrl_vq first */
>>> + virtio_del_queue(vdev, old_num_queues - 1);
>> Why ctrl vq must be first to be deleted?
> It just make the codes clean. We always need to remove and add ctrl vq if
> old_num_queues != new_num_queues. We only enter one of the two loops.
>
>>> +
>>> + for (i = new_num_queues - 1; i < old_num_queues - 1; i++) {
>>> + virtio_del_queue(vdev, i);
>> Do we need to delete bh and timer also here?
> I think we should delete it too. Before commit da51a335, we only call
> virtio_del_queue(), so I forgot to do it.
>
> Thanks
> Wen Congyang
I believe we need this patch for 2.4. So could you please do this in V2?
Thanks
>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + for (i = old_num_queues - 1; i < new_num_queues - 1; i += 2) {
>>> + virtio_net_add_queue(n, i / 2);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* add ctrl_vq last */
>>> + n->ctrl_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 64, virtio_net_handle_ctrl);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void virtio_net_set_multiqueue(VirtIONet *n, int multiqueue)
>>> {
>>> + int max = multiqueue ? n->max_queues : 1;
>>> +
>>> n->multiqueue = multiqueue;
>>> + virtio_net_change_num_queues(n, max);
>>>
>>> virtio_net_set_queues(n);
>>> }
>>> @@ -1583,21 +1636,7 @@ static void virtio_net_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> }
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < n->max_queues; i++) {
>>> - n->vqs[i].rx_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 256, virtio_net_handle_rx);
>>> - if (n->net_conf.tx && !strcmp(n->net_conf.tx, "timer")) {
>>> - n->vqs[i].tx_vq =
>>> - virtio_add_queue(vdev, 256, virtio_net_handle_tx_timer);
>>> - n->vqs[i].tx_timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL,
>>> - virtio_net_tx_timer,
>>> - &n->vqs[i]);
>>> - } else {
>>> - n->vqs[i].tx_vq =
>>> - virtio_add_queue(vdev, 256, virtio_net_handle_tx_bh);
>>> - n->vqs[i].tx_bh = qemu_bh_new(virtio_net_tx_bh, &n->vqs[i]);
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - n->vqs[i].tx_waiting = 0;
>>> - n->vqs[i].n = n;
>>> + virtio_net_add_queue(n, i);
>>> }
>>>
>>> n->ctrl_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, 64, virtio_net_handle_ctrl);
>> .
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 6:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: remove virtio queues if the guest doesn't support multiqueue Wen Congyang
2015-07-15 6:59 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-15 7:13 ` Wen Congyang
2015-07-15 7:41 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-07-15 7:53 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A60EAA.10205@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).