From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
rjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] AioContext: fix broken ctx->dispatching optimization
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:34:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A77AB1.80303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150716091450.GA5050@noname.redhat.com>
On 16/07/2015 11:14, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> With this information, I understand that what has changed is that the
>>> > > return value of g_main_context_iteration() changes from true before this
>>> > > patch (had the aio_notify() from aio_set_fd_handler() pending) to false
>>> > > after the patch (aio_notify() doesn't inject an event any more).
>>> > >
>>> > > This should mean that like above we can assert that the first iteration
>>> > > returns false, i.e. reverse the assertion (and indeed, with this
>>> > > change the test still passes for me).
>> >
>> > I was a bit undecided about this. In the end I decided that the calls
>> > to aio_poll/g_main_context_iteration were just to put the AioContext in
>> > a known state, and the assertions on the return value of g_assert were
>> > not really important. For this reason, the while loop seemed to express
>> > the intentions best, and I made it consistent between the AioContext and
>> > GSource cases.
> You changed the AioContext case in this same patch, even if you didn't
> quote my comment on that hunk. :-)
>
> Both cases were asserting the return value before.
I'll change the testcase (other than the aio_notify testcase) in a
separate patch.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 17:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] AioContext: fix broken ctx->dispatching optimization Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 18:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-15 20:14 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-07-15 22:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16 9:14 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-07-16 9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-16 5:29 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-16 9:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16 9:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-16 10:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A77AB1.80303@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).