qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	rjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] AioContext: fix broken ctx->dispatching optimization
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:34:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A77AB1.80303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150716091450.GA5050@noname.redhat.com>



On 16/07/2015 11:14, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> With this information, I understand that what has changed is that the
>>> > > return value of g_main_context_iteration() changes from true before this
>>> > > patch (had the aio_notify() from aio_set_fd_handler() pending) to false
>>> > > after the patch (aio_notify() doesn't inject an event any more).
>>> > > 
>>> > > This should mean that like above we can assert that the first iteration
>>> > > returns false, i.e. reverse the assertion (and indeed, with this
>>> > > change the test still passes for me).
>> > 
>> > I was a bit undecided about this.  In the end I decided that the calls
>> > to aio_poll/g_main_context_iteration were just to put the AioContext in
>> > a known state, and the assertions on the return value of g_assert were
>> > not really important.  For this reason, the while loop seemed to express
>> > the intentions best, and I made it consistent between the AioContext and
>> > GSource cases.
> You changed the AioContext case in this same patch, even if you didn't
> quote my comment on that hunk. :-)
> 
> Both cases were asserting the return value before.

I'll change the testcase (other than the aio_notify testcase) in a
separate patch.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-16  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-15 17:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] AioContext: fix broken ctx->dispatching optimization Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 18:00 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-15 20:14 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-07-15 22:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16  9:14     ` Kevin Wolf
2015-07-16  9:34       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-16  5:29 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-16  9:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-16  9:16   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-16 10:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A77AB1.80303@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).