From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48264)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1ZGRN4-0005uT-6D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:37:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1ZGRN0-00085S-6u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:37:38 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:37381)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1ZGRN0-00085M-03
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:37:34 -0400
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so61650306wib.0
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 05:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1437212383.git.crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
	<d8cd6b1bb36705f1b76d64e9f25af1cf44e60cbc.1437212383.git.crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
	<55AA4388.9070008@redhat.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <55AA4889.9050000@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 14:37:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55AA4388.9070008@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/35] include/exec: Split target_long
 def to new header
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org



On 18/07/2015 14:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > +/* target_ulong is the type of a virtual address */
>> > +#if TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 4
>> > +#define target_long int32_t
>> > +#define target_ulong uint32_t
>> > +#define TARGET_FMT_lx "%08x"
>> > +#define TARGET_FMT_ld "%d"
>> > +#define TARGET_FMT_lu "%u"
>> > +#elif TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 8
>> > +#define target_long int64_t
>> > +#define target_ulong uint64_t
>> > +#define TARGET_FMT_lx "%016" PRIx64
>> > +#define TARGET_FMT_ld "%" PRId64
>> > +#define TARGET_FMT_lu "%" PRIu64
>> > +#else
>> > +#error TARGET_LONG_SIZE undefined
>> > +#endif
> Would it be possible, or make sense, to do
> 
> #define target_long arm_target_long
> #define target_ulong arm_target_ulong
> 
> instead?  This makes prototypes nicer when printed in the debugger with
> ptype.  Where could this be done?

Hmm, ISTR that this was more or less what v2 was like, so I guess you
made the change for a reason. :)  So ignore this.

Paolo