qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Fontana <claudio.fontana@huawei.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: kvm: Differentiate registers based on write-back levels
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:56:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AF92EB.9050909@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150717153901.GD14024@cbox>

On 17.07.2015 17:39, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:29:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 16 July 2015 at 12:34, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Some registers like the CNTVCT register should only be written to the
>>> kernel as part of machine initialization or on vmload operations, but
>>> never during runtime, as this can potentially make time go backwards or
>>> create inconsistent time observations between VCPUs.
>>>
>>> Introduce a list of registers that should not be written back at runtime
>>> and check this list on syncing the register state to the KVM state.
>>
>> Thanks. I think this should go into QEMU 2.4, given that it fixes
>> a bug with time misbehaving in guests. Are you happy that it's
>> received enough testing? (I have given 32-bit KVM a spin but have
>> no convenient 64-bit box to test with, and besides, I didn't notice the
>> bug in the first place :-))
> 
> I tested this on both Juno and Mustang, with a simple loop kernel
> booting and doing hackbench test, but if we want to be on the extra
> careful side, perhaps Alex can run it through his migration test setup?
> I don't think that's necessary though.
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since RFC:
>>>  - Move cpreg_level to kvm_arm_cpreg_level and into kvm32.c and kvm64.c
>>>  - Changed struct name and declare as static const
>>
>> I have a couple of minor comments on the comments below, and you
>> forgot to update the stub version of write_list_to_kvmstate().
>> I can just fix these up as I put it into target-arm.next, though.
>> Fixed up version at:
>>
>>  https://git.linaro.org/people/peter.maydell/qemu-arm.git target-arm.next
>>
>> If interested parties could test that by end-of-Monday that
>> would be nice (since rc2 is scheduled for Tuesday).
>>
>>>  dtc                  |  2 +-
>>>  target-arm/kvm.c     |  6 +++++-
>>>  target-arm/kvm32.c   | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  target-arm/kvm64.c   | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  target-arm/kvm_arm.h | 12 +++++++++++-
>>>  target-arm/machine.c |  2 +-
>>>  6 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/dtc b/dtc
>>> index 65cc4d2..bc895d6 160000
>>> --- a/dtc
>>> +++ b/dtc
>>> @@ -1 +1 @@
>>> -Subproject commit 65cc4d2748a2c2e6f27f1cf39e07a5dbabd80ebf
>>> +Subproject commit bc895d6d09695d05ceb8b52486ffe861d6cfbdde
>>
>> Stray submodule change :-)
>>
> 
> Damn, keeps happening to me.  ok, I'll stop using git commit -a for qemu
> changes.
> 
>>> diff --git a/target-arm/kvm32.c b/target-arm/kvm32.c
>>> index d7e7d68..6769815 100644
>>> --- a/target-arm/kvm32.c
>>> +++ b/target-arm/kvm32.c
>>> @@ -153,6 +153,34 @@ bool kvm_arm_reg_syncs_via_cpreg_list(uint64_t regidx)
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +typedef struct CPRegStateLevel {
>>> +    uint64_t regidx;
>>> +    int level;
>>> +} CPRegStateLevel;
>>> +
>>> +/* All coprocessor registers not listed in the following table are assumed to
>>> + * be of the level KVM_PUT_RUNTIME_STATE, a register should be written less
>>
>> ". If a register".
>>
>>> + * often, you must add it to this table with a state of either
>>> + * KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE or KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE.
>>> + */
>>> +static const CPRegStateLevel non_runtime_cpregs[] = {
>>> +    { KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT, KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE },
>>> +};
>>
>>> diff --git a/target-arm/kvm64.c b/target-arm/kvm64.c
>>> index ac34f51..d59f41c 100644
>>> --- a/target-arm/kvm64.c
>>> +++ b/target-arm/kvm64.c
>>> @@ -139,6 +139,34 @@ bool kvm_arm_reg_syncs_via_cpreg_list(uint64_t regidx)
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +typedef struct CPRegStateLevel {
>>> +    uint64_t regidx;
>>> +    int level;
>>> +} CPRegStateLevel;
>>> +
>>> +/* All system not listed in the following table are assumed to be of the level
>>
>> "system registers"
>>
>>> + * KVM_PUT_RUNTIME_STATE, a register should be written less often, you must
>>
>> ". If a register"
>>
>>> + * add it to this table with a state of either KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE or
>>> + * KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE.
>>> + */
>>> +static const CPRegStateLevel non_runtime_cpregs[] = {
>>> +    { KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT, KVM_PUT_FULL_STATE },
>>> +};
>>
>>> --- a/target-arm/kvm_arm.h
>>> +++ b/target-arm/kvm_arm.h
>>
>>> @@ -83,7 +93,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_reg_syncs_via_cpreg_list(uint64_t regidx);
>>>  * Note that we do not stop early on failure -- we will attempt
>>>   * writing all registers in the list.
>>>  */
>>> -bool write_list_to_kvmstate(ARMCPU *cpu);
>>> +bool write_list_to_kvmstate(ARMCPU *cpu, int level);
>>
>> You forgot to update the stub function in target-arm/kvm-stub.c,
>> so this breaks compilation on non-ARM hosts.
>>
> whoops, who cares about non-ARM hosts anyway.
> 
> Thanks for fixing these up, the fixed up version looks good.
> -Christoffer
> 

Hi,

I can if you want check if this patch actually fixes the problem without the KVM workaround.
Is this the version I am supposed to test, or should I wait for the next respin?

Thanks,

Claudio



-- 
Claudio Fontana
Server Virtualization Architect
Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf GmbH
Riesstraße 25 - 80992 München

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-22 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-16 11:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-arm: kvm: Differentiate registers based on write-back levels Christoffer Dall
2015-07-17 14:29 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-17 15:39   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-22 12:56     ` Claudio Fontana [this message]
2015-07-22 14:03       ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-22 16:09         ` Claudio Fontana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55AF92EB.9050909@huawei.com \
    --to=claudio.fontana@huawei.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).