From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIEVL-0006v7-Ko for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:17:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIEVG-0004R1-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:17:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIEVG-0004Qr-60 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:17:30 -0400 References: <1437649371-29284-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1437649371-29284-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <55B0CD46.7050801@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:17:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] framebuffer: set DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA on RAM that is used for the framebuffer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers On 23/07/2015 13:13, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > + * Negative if the framebuffer is stored in the opposite order (e.g. > should these be "i.e.", or do we allow the source framebuffer to be > either way round? I think we do, that's why I used "e.g.". Paolo >> > + * bottom-to-top) compared to the framebuffer.