From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZISTw-0008TQ-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:13:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZISTr-0003yU-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:13:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZISTr-0003yQ-PG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:12:59 -0400 Message-ID: <55B19F25.10905@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:12:53 +0800 From: Jason Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55AC9859.3050100@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150720103208.GA12675@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [POC] colo-proxy in qemu List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dong, Eddie" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Li Zhijian Cc: zhanghailiang , "jan.kiszka@siemens.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "peter.huangpeng" , "Gonglei (Arei)" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , Yang Hongyang , "dgilbert@redhat.com" On 07/24/2015 10:04 AM, Dong, Eddie wrote: > Hi Stefan: > Thanks for your comments! > >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 02:42:33PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: >>> We are planning to implement colo-proxy in qemu to cache and compare >> packets. >> >> I thought there is a kernel module to do that? > Yes, that is the previous solution the COLO sub-community choose to go, but we realized it might be not the best choices, and thus we want to bring discussion back here :) More comments are welcome. > Hi: Could you pls describe more details on this decision? What's the reason that you realize it was not the best choice? Thanks