From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devl <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5] rcu: Allow calling rcu_(un)register_thread() during synchronize_rcu()
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:54:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B60DD8.4020708@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B60D7C.4050100@redhat.com>
On 07/27/2015 06:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 27/07/2015 12:44, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> * rcu_register_thread() may add nodes to ®istry; it will not
>>> * wake up synchronize_rcu, but that is okay because at least another
>>> * thread must exit its RCU read-side critical section before
>>> * synchronize_rcu is done. The next iteration of the loop will
>>> * process the new thread or set ->waiting for it. Hence, this can
>>> * at worst cause synchronize_rcu() to wait for longer.
>> I don't understand this. The next iteration of the loop will move the new thread's
>> rcu_reader from registry to qsreaders even if we call rcu_read_lock() in the new thread.
>> Because rcu_gp_ongoing() will return false.
>
> You're right. This proves that a comment was necessary! :)
Yes, I agree with it.
>
> Second try:
>
> * rcu_register_thread() may add nodes to ®istry; it will not
> * wake up synchronize_rcu, but that is okay because at least another
> * thread must exit its RCU read-side critical section before
> * synchronize_rcu is done. The next iteration of the loop will
> * move the new thread's rcu_reader from ®istry to &qsreaders,
> * because rcu_gp_ongoing() will return false.
I will update the comment and send it again.
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> Paolo
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 2:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.5] rcu: Allow calling rcu_(un)register_thread() during synchronize_rcu() Wen Congyang
2015-07-27 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-27 10:44 ` Wen Congyang
2015-07-27 10:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-27 10:54 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B60DD8.4020708@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).