From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43115)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>) id 1ZJgKZ-0001cW-5w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:12:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>) id 1ZJgKS-0004kZ-Pq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:12:27 -0400
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:15721)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>) id 1ZJgKS-0004j5-2T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:12:20 -0400
Message-ID: <55B611FA.4000203@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:11:54 +0800
From: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1437978359-17960-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
	<55B605EE.5050502@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <55B605EE.5050502@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhost-scsi: Fix mask index err in
	vhost_scsi_start
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Lu Lina <lina.lulina@huawei.com>

On 2015/7/27 18:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27/07/2015 08:25, arei.gonglei@huawei.com wrote:
>> +++ b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int vhost_scsi_start(VHostSCSI *s)
>>       * enabling/disabling irqfd.
>>       */
>>      for (i = 0; i < s->dev.nvqs; i++) {
>> -        vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, i, false);
>> +        vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, s->dev.vq_index + i, false);
>>      }
>>  
>>      return ret;
> 
> Is this fixing an actual bug, or just using the API correctly?
> s->dev.vq_index is always 0, right?
> 
Yes.  At present, we found that s->dev.vq_index is always 0.

Regards,
-Gonglei