From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJgXC-0007oS-Jn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:25:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJgX7-0002g9-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:25:30 -0400 References: <55AC9859.3050100@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150720103208.GA12675@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <55ACE1B4.4010109@huawei.com> <55ADE316.1060704@siemens.com> <20150721094929.GD13993@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <20150727101305.GD30018@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> From: zhanghailiang Message-ID: <55B61505.3080209@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:24:53 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150727101305.GD30018@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [POC] colo-proxy in qemu List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Li Zhijian , Jan Kiszka , Jason Wang , peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, Vasiliy Tolstov , qemu-devel , "Gonglei (Arei)" , samuel.thibault@gnu.org, samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, Yang Hongyang , Dave Gilbert On 2015/7/27 18:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:49:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:13:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2015-07-20 17:01, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: >>>>> 2015-07-20 14:55 GMT+03:00 zhanghailiang : >>>>>> Agreed, besides, it is seemed that slirp is not supporting ipv6, we also >>>>>> have to supplement it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> patch for ipv6 slirp support some times ago sended to qemu list, but i >>>>> don't know why in not accepted. >>>> >>>> I think no one reviewed it but there was no objection against IPv6 >>>> support in principle. >>>> >>>> Jan: Can we merge slirp IPv6 support for QEMU 2.5? >>> >>> Sorry, as I pointed out some time back, I don't have the bandwidth to >>> look into slirp. Someone need to do a review, then send a pull request. >> >> Do you want to remove yourself from the slirp section of the MAINTAINERS >> file? >> >> Going forward we'll need to find someone familiar with the QEMU >> development process and with enough time to review slirp patches. > > Ping? > > I hoped this would raise some discussion and that maybe we could find a > new maintainer or co-maintainer to get slirp moving. > Yes, please, this is important, we need slirp's maintainer to help reviewing the COLO proxy patches that will be implemented based on slirp. (If we finally come to an agreement on realizing it in qemu) We also need to support ipv6 for slirp, i have emailed Samuel who have sent ipv6 patches for slirp before, but got no response. (I would like to respin and test Samuel's ipv6 slirp patch if he don't have time to do this, but firstly, i need to get his permission ：） ） Cc: Samuel Thibault . Thanks, zhanghailiang > Any thoughts? > > Stefan >