From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] Recent patches for 2.4
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:39:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C1CBDA.6050803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN05THSN09B94JZ9DQ1AV6JKKmNhjKZ9mEHoExodfQ-grukK5w@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/08/2015 01:23, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
>
> You only get >0 from this call if there are actual bytes available to read.
>
> For context, the problem was that
>
>
> 75 static void nfs_process_read(void *arg)
> 76 {
> 77 NFSClient *client = arg;
> 78 nfs_service(client->context, POLLIN);
> 79 nfs_set_events(client);
> 80 }
>
> sometimes trigger and call nfs_service(POLLIN) eventhough the socket is
> not readable.
Does read() return -1/EAGAIN or 0?
If it returns 0, then this is expected: it means that the other side has
shutdown the socket's write-side. libnfs should either reconnect, or
disable POLLIN, treat all pending operations as aborted and stop
submitting more.
Paolo
> I verified this by adding an extra call to poll() at around line 78
> to check whether POLLIN was actually set on the fd or not. Sometimes it
> would not be but I got lost in the sources and could not find if or
> where this happens or even if qemu even guarantees "only call the POLLIN
> callbacks if the filedescriptor is actually readable".
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-31 8:12 [Qemu-devel] Recent patches for 2.4 Peter Lieven
2015-07-31 8:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-31 8:35 ` Peter Lieven
2015-07-31 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-04 9:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] " Peter Lieven
2015-08-04 11:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-04 11:57 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-04 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-04 12:29 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-04 12:53 ` Peter Lieven
2015-08-04 23:23 ` ronnie sahlberg
2015-08-05 8:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-08-06 7:51 ` Peter Lieven
2015-09-03 13:11 ` Peter Lieven
2015-09-07 16:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-07 19:11 ` Peter Lieven
2015-09-07 19:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-07 21:05 ` Peter Lieven
2015-09-21 7:40 ` Peter Lieven
2015-09-21 9:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-21 9:52 ` Peter Lieven
2015-09-21 12:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-04 18:20 ` Michael Roth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C1CBDA.6050803@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).