From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47817)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dl.soluz@gmx.net>) id 1ZNHMb-00019O-6q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:21:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dl.soluz@gmx.net>) id 1ZNHMX-0003mc-Uy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:21:25 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:49819)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dl.soluz@gmx.net>) id 1ZNHMX-0003mI-Jt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:21:21 -0400
References: <55B734A7.8040108@gmx.net>
	<CACXAS8CYCyGW+4P0=DzJu8D+zsiAzMZhzBqWrZVuUBO-HEkiwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55B870A9.4090008@gmx.net> <20150729150147.GO11361@aurel32.net>
	<55B99F95.8010603@gmx.net> <20150730075252.GT11361@aurel32.net>
	<55B9DD60.8020801@gmx.net> <20150730085500.GV11361@aurel32.net>
	<55BF7FF7.8080308@gmx.net>
	<CAMO55f=S0HDn7LMYWVxka+=GCDxym-B3pXdcJEA3y1k1-3pF9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<55BFC62E.4030001@gmx.net>
	<CAMO55f=DVv8EHQFHsAEsYe-AtPBH7WpSFo28R1kYm3GKwpvOLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <55C32710.3060405@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:21:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMO55f=DVv8EHQFHsAEsYe-AtPBH7WpSFo28R1kYm3GKwpvOLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debian 7.8.0 SPARC64 on qemu - anything i can do
 to speedup the emulation?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Karel Gardas <gardask@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>

i don't know nothing about NetBSD - network isn't working (or dhcp 
inactive - i don't know), can't install wget etc. - so it will take some 
time

Am 06.08.2015 um 11:00 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> Denis, if NetBSD is fast in qemu and if it provides sparc64 user-land,
> perhaps also its GCC is sparc64 binary and if so, then it would be
> good if you do your original benchmark of compiling pugixml.cpp and
> write the numbers here for comparison? I would certainly appreciate it
> since I'll not get to this testing in foreseeable future again.
>
> Thanks! Karel
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Am 03.08.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@gmx.net> wrote:
> >> > ok - NetBSD 6.5.1 SPARC64 is blasting fast compare to Debian 7.8.0
> >> > SPARC64 -
> >> > i installed the complete system (without X) in a few minutes
> >> > Debian needs >1h
> >>
> >> I had the same experience with OpenBSD for sparc64, also fast to
> >> install. The problem is that this is due to simplicity and amount of
> >> data/bins to install and not due to fact qemu got miraculously faster
> >> with *bsd sparc64 bins I'm afraid. IIRC mu compile nbench2 benchmark
> >> reveals +- the same performance on sparc64/openbsd and on
> >> sparc64/sparc32-userland debian.
> >
> >
> > need to check the installation size - but NetBSD was "full install (without
> > x)" and
> > debian was just "basic system utilities"
> >
> > NetBSD comes with gcc with this installtion type, debian not
> >