From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpu8-0001KE-CN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:26:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpu3-0005Th-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:26:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:34653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOpu3-0005Sy-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:26:23 -0400 Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so142831012wic.1 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1439220437-23957-1-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> <1439220437-23957-17-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <55C8D0A9.7010902@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:26:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1439220437-23957-17-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V7 16/19] translate-all: introduces tb_flush_safe. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: fred.konrad@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mttcg@listserver.greensocs.com Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, mark.burton@greensocs.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com, guillaume.delbergue@greensocs.com On 10/08/2015 17:27, fred.konrad@greensocs.com wrote: > + > +void tb_flush_safe(CPUState *cpu) > +{ > +#if 0 /* !MTTCG */ > + tb_flush(cpu); > +#else > + async_run_safe_work_on_cpu(cpu, tb_flush_work, cpu); > +#endif /* MTTCG */ > +} > + I think this can use first_cpu unconditionally; tb_flush only uses its argument for an error message. In fact, I think that by definition async_run_safe_work_on_cpu can use any CPU for its work; it locks out everyone else, so it does not matter which thread you're on. So async_run_safe_work_on_cpu could drop the @cpu argument (becoming async_run_safe_cpu_work) and use first_cpu unconditionally. Paolo