qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/nfs: cache allocated filesize for read-only files
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 20:11:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D769C4.4010205@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55D755F6.2@redhat.com>

Am 21.08.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Max Reitz:
> On 2015-08-21 at 00:49, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> If the file is readonly its not expected to grow so
>> save the blocking call to nfs_fstat_async and use
>> the value saved at connection time. Also important
>> the monitor (and thus the main loop) will not hang
>> if block device info is queried and the NFS share
>> is unresponsive.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
>> ---
>>   block/nfs.c | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> First, I don't like the idea of this patch very much, but since I've never used qemu's native NFS client, it's not up to me to decide whether it's worth it.

I am trying to solve that a stale NFS Server with a CDROM ISO on it can hang Qemus main loop. One of the things that happens is that
you query "info block" in hmp or "query-block" via QMP and indirectly call bdrv_get_allocated_file_size and bang, Qemu hangs. Also I don't
know if its worth to issue an RPC call for each executing of info block.


>
> When it comes to breaking this, what comes to mind first is some external program opening the image read-write outside of qemu and writing to it. Maybe that's a case we generally don't want, but maybe that's something some people do on purpose, knowing what they're doing (with raw images), you never know.

I would consider this bad behaviour. However, allocated file size shouldn't matter for raw images. If you resize the image from external you have to call bdrv_truncate anyway to make Qemu aware
of that change.

>
> Other than that, there's reopening. As far as I'm aware, qemu can reopen a R/W image read-only, and if that happens, st_blocks may be stale.

Thats a valid point. But it can be solved be implementing .bdrv_reopen_prepare and update st_blocks there.

Thanks for you thoughts,
Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-21 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-21  7:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/nfs: cache allocated filesize for read-only files Peter Lieven
2015-08-21 16:46 ` Max Reitz
2015-08-21 18:11   ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2015-08-21 18:23     ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55D769C4.4010205@kamp.de \
    --to=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).