From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUwOK-0005Fv-8Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:34:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUwOH-0007KG-1o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:34:52 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:45313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUwOG-0007K2-SJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:34:48 -0400 References: <1439380232-20660-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> <55DC3B51.5060400@openvz.org> <55DEF435.8090007@openvz.org> From: "Denis V. Lunev" Message-ID: <55DF03DE.1090907@openvz.org> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:34:38 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 2.5 0/3] Move target- and device specific code from monitor List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Luiz Capitulino , QEMU Developers , Pavel Butsykin On 08/27/2015 03:13 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 August 2015 at 12:27, Denis V. Lunev wrote: >> On 08/25/2015 12:54 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote: >>> On 08/12/2015 02:50 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote: >>>> The monivation of this set is simple. Recently we have proposed patch >>>> to monitor.c with specific x86 APIC HMP commands. The patchset was denied >>>> with the main motivation "No more arch specific code in monitor.c" >>>> This patchset is the first step to move arch specific code from >>>> monitor.c targets. >>>> >>> ping v2 >> ping v3 as per verbal discussion on KVM forum >> about timeouts :) > Pinging three times in a week is excessive. This is on my > to-review queue, but so is a lot of other stuff. > > -- PMM ok. sorry for that. I'll try not to abuse you in future. Den P.S. Is there any public representation of your queue :) ? This may help to avoid such misunderstandings.