qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] rtl8139: correctly track full receive buffer in standard mode
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:59:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E4256F.9010302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440770817-20555-3-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>



On 08/28/2015 10:06 PM, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> In standard operation mode, when the receive ring buffer
> is full, the buffer actually appears empty to the driver since
> the RxBufAddr (the location we wirte new data to) and RxBufPtr
> (the location guest would stat reading from) are the same.
> As a result, the call to rtl8139_RxBufferEmpty ends up
> returning true indicating that the receive buffer is empty.
> This would result in the next packet overwriting the recevie buffer
> again and stalling receive operations.
>
> This patch tracks the number of unread bytes in the rxbuffer
> using an unused C+ register.  On every read and write, the
> number is adjsted and the special case of a full buffer is also
> trapped.
>
> The C+ register trick is used to simplify migration and not require
> a new machine type.  This register is not used in regular mode
> and C+ mode doesn't have the same issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/net/rtl8139.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I'm not sure this can happen. For example, looks like the following
check in rtl8139_do_receive():

        if (avail != 0 && size + 8 >= avail)
        {

can guarantee there's no overwriting?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-31  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-28 14:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] rtl8139: Fix buffer overflow in standard mode Vladislav Yasevich
2015-08-28 14:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] rtl8139: Do not consume the packet during " Vladislav Yasevich
2015-08-28 14:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] rtl8139: correctly track full receive buffer " Vladislav Yasevich
2015-08-31  9:59   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-08-31 14:24     ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-09-01  3:15       ` Jason Wang
2015-09-01 11:29         ` Vlad Yasevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E4256F.9010302@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).