From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
To: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"Le Tan" <tamlokveer@gmail.com>, "Alexander Graf" <agraf@suse.de>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
"Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber@web.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] intel_iommu: Add support for translation for devices behind bridges
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:30:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E6EBE1.5070709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441133302-18950-1-git-send-email-knut.omang@oracle.com>
On 09/01/2015 09:48 PM, Knut Omang wrote:
> This patch set changes the data structure used to handle address spaces within
> the emulated Intel iommu to support traversal also if bus numbers are dynamically
> allocated, as is the case for devices that sit behind root ports or downstream switches.
> This means that we cannot use bus number as index, instead a QLIST is used.
>
> This requires a change in the API for setup of IOMMUs which is taken care of by
> the first patch. The second patch implements the fix.
>
> The initial patch set had some discussion related to whether this fix, applied to the
> bridge code, was applicable to all bridges. No clear conclusion arised as far as I understood,
> in the meantime a number of people have run into the same issue as I did which lead me
> to implement this, so I gather it might be a useful intermediate solution that works until
> a better approach can be found? I believe the IOMMU emulation code has limited usefulness
> if it only supports devices sitting directly on the root complex.
Hi,
Thank you for (re)sending the patches!
While I believe you are perfectly right and IOMMU
would benefit from this addition, I saw that are some reviews
in the prev thread that are not purely theoretical/philosophical.
E.g. PCIDevice *dev field in VTDAddressSpace and maybe a few more.
I would suggest to address them so it will be easier to continue the review process.
Thank you,
Marcel
>
> This is the thread following the initial patch set:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/302246
>
> The patch set was also discussed in this thread:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/316949
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Rebased to current master
> - Fixed minor syntax issues
>
> Knut Omang (2):
> iommu: Replace bus+devfn arguments with PCIDevice* in PCIIOMMUFunc
> intel_iommu: Add support for translation for devices behind bridges.
>
> hw/alpha/typhoon.c | 2 +-
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> hw/pci-host/apb.c | 2 +-
> hw/pci-host/prep.c | 3 +--
> hw/pci-host/q35.c | 42 +++++++++++++-------------------
> hw/pci/pci.c | 7 +++---
> hw/pci/pci_bridge.c | 6 +++++
> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 2 +-
> include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 6 +++--
> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 5 +++-
> 10 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.4.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 18:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] intel_iommu: Add support for translation for devices behind bridges Knut Omang
2015-09-01 18:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu: Replace bus+devfn arguments with PCIDevice* in PCIIOMMUFunc Knut Omang
2015-09-01 18:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] intel_iommu: Add support for translation for devices behind bridges Knut Omang
2015-09-02 12:30 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2015-09-02 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Knut Omang
2015-09-02 16:12 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-02 22:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-09-03 5:26 ` Knut Omang
2015-09-12 18:37 ` Knut Omang
2015-09-12 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-09-13 7:04 ` Knut Omang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E6EBE1.5070709@gmail.com \
--to=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=knut.omang@oracle.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=tamlokveer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).