From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXAhn-0004c7-7X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:16:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXAhj-00012T-Fh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:16:11 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXAhj-00012E-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:16:07 -0400 References: <1440590594-5514-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <20150902090539.GB22094@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Message-ID: <55E720C6.1060902@suse.de> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 18:16:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150902090539.GB22094@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/7] Making QOM introspectable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Markus Armbruster Am 02.09.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: > Ping, any thoughts on this.... The subject is a little offensive as QOM *is* our introspection framework for devices and objects. What this really seems to be about is static vs. per-instance (dynamic) introspection. Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG N= =C3=BCrnberg)