From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59325)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1ZXR1x-0005JE-C1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 05:42:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1ZXR1u-0001HN-5f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 05:42:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56737)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1ZXR1t-0001EJ-N9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 05:42:02 -0400
References: <55E80FF8.10200@redhat.com>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <55E815E5.5030904@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:41:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E80FF8.10200@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "Using Python to investigate EFI and ACPI"
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>, qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Michael Tsirkin <mtsirkin@redhat.com>, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, "Moore,
	Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Smith,
	Jonathan D" <jonathan.d.smith@intel.com>, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>

Side point:

On 09/03/15 11:16, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> 
> I just found the LWN.net article with the title in the subject:
> 
>   http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/655992/04701db2bbb7e716/
> 
> ("Thank you LWN", of course. :))

I've just been advised in private, well-meaningly, that I shouldn't post
LWN Subscriber Links publicly.

I did that consciously. The notice on LWN's Subscriber Link generator
page is *not* lost on me; however, Jonathan Corbet has previously
publicly approved such *occasional* posting:

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/2lfhh8/kdbus_meets_linuxkernel_lwnnet/clumuze

I thought making this one article publicly readable "early" was (a)
basis for this discussion, (b) showcasing the value of LWN's journalism
(ie. "advertisment").

Thanks
Laszlo