From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
zhaoshenglong@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Allow ACPI default OEM ID and OEM table ID fields to be set.
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:37:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E8692B.5070201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55E8646F.20401@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On 09/03/15 17:17, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 03.09.2015 18:09, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 09/02/15 23:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:03:37PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>> When using qemu's internal ACPI table generation, qemu sets the fields
>>>> OEM ID and OEM table ID to arbitrary default values. OEM ID is set to
>>>> "BOCHS " and OEM table ID is set to "BXPCxxxx" where "xxxx" is
>>>> replaced by the ACPI table name (eg. "BXPCRSDT" for the RSDT table).
>>>>
>>>> This patch allows you to override these default values.
>>>>
>>>> Use one of these alternatives:
>>>>
>>>> qemu -acpidefault oem_id=ABCD,oem_table_id=EFGH
>>>> qemu -acpidefault oem_id=ABCD,oem_table_id=EFGHIJKL
>>>>
>>>> In the first case, the last four types of the OEM table name field are
>>>> set to the ACPI table name.
>>>>
>>>> This does not affect the -acpitable option (for user-defined ACPI
>>>> tables), which has its own method for setting these fields.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I don't think the 1st option makes sense - why force
>>> 4 bytes of the ID?
>>>
>>> And the issue with the 2nd one is that it won't work if
>>> there are two tables with same ID - which might be the
>>> case for SSID and UEFI tables at least.
>>>
>>> Maybe specify this per signature?
>>
>> I agree with these remarks, but I'd propose a different idea for solving
>> the OEM Table ID problem.
>>
>> As can be seen from the previous discussion that Rich linked in the
>> blurb, and from Michael Tokarev's patch, and from Chris Evich's earlier
>> testing of Win8.1 (linked in the previous discussion), the *only* guest
>> OS where this matters is Windows 7. And Windows 7 doesn't care about the
>> OEM Table Id, only the OEM Id.
>
> Actually win7 do care about oem table id. And my patch shows it. This
> is the minimal portion of RSDT (and also FACP in UEFI mode) which should
> match SLIC -- oem_id (6 bytes) and oem_table_id (8 bytes). My patch copies
> 10 bytes starting with oem_id.
Actually, 6 + 4 + 4 = 14, so OemID and OemTableID. But, you are right, I
was working off the commit message & comments only, not the actual
amount of bytes copied.
This ties down both OemID and OemTableId, between all of RSDT, SLIC, and
FADT. Since
- I argue against exposing a generic oem_table_id on the command
line (unlike oem_id),
- and I also find that an oem_table_id "map" would be overkill,
I think it follows that I can only ask for the special SLIC-handling
logic already visible in your patch. "User passed in SLIC --> adapt RSDT
and FADT." That is, it is already user-controlled.
(The FADT change will ensure that OVMF will update the RSDT that *it*
installs.)
This is just my preference, of course... But at least it doesn't seem to
conflict with Michael's! :)
Thanks
Laszlo
> Without that, win7 offline activation
> doesn't work.
>
> FWIW :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> /mjt
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-03 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-02 19:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Allow ACPI default OEM ID and OEM table ID fields to be set Richard W.M. Jones
2015-09-02 19:03 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-09-02 19:16 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-09-02 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-09-03 15:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-03 15:17 ` Michael Tokarev
2015-09-03 15:37 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2015-09-03 16:33 ` Michael Tokarev
2015-09-03 16:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-03 19:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-09-03 19:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-09-03 20:51 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-09-02 19:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] acpi: Remove unused definition Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E8692B.5070201@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).