From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZi4l-0002Ty-0h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:18:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZi4h-0005is-KA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:18:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:38450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZi4h-0005ih-DY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:18:19 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so27974590wic.1 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1441173123-25540-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <55EF3069.3010802@twiddle.net> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <55F05BC8.3080303@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:18:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/20] Do away with TB retranslation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Artyom Tarasenko , Richard Henderson Cc: Dennis Luehring , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , Aurelien Jarno On 09/09/2015 17:05, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 09/08/2015 11:56 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> My sparc test image (which is just the 32-bit debian from >>> Aurelien's website) boots fine even with this patchset... >> >> Odd, it shouldn't. ;-) >> >> Anyway, I've just fixed the sparc problem and re-pushed the tree to >> >> git://github.com/rth7680/qemu.git tcg-search-2 >> >> for anyone who wants to do any more testing. > > Great work! Both debian wheezy/sparc and debian sid/sparc64 work. > My benchmark (running g++ as described here [1]) shows ~3x speed up > factor. Not bad! Does the optimizer still make things slower? Paolo