From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, michael@ellerman.id.au,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, amit.shah@redhat.com,
Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 1/2] spapr: Add support for hwrng when available
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:30:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F28314.7070608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150911004527.GF11781@voom>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4070 bytes --]
On 11/09/15 02:45, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:03:39PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 10/09/15 12:40, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:33:21AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 09/09/15 23:10, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> On 08/09/15 07:15, David Gibson wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>>> At this point rather than just implementing them as discrete machine
>>>>>> options, I suspect it will be more maintainable to split out the
>>>>>> h-random implementation as a pseudo-device with its own qdev and so
>>>>>> forth. We already do similarly for the RTAS time of day functions
>>>>>> (spapr-rtc).
>>>>>
>>>>> I gave that I try, but it does not work as expected. To be able to
>>>>> specify the options, I'd need to instantiate this device with the
>>>>> "-device" option, right? Something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> -device spapr-rng,backend=rng0,usekvm=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Now this does not work when I use TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE as parent class
>>>>> like it is done for spapr-rtc, since the user apparently can not plug
>>>>> device to this bus on machine spapr (you can also not plug an spapr-rtc
>>>>> device this way!).
>>>>>
>>>>> The spapr-vlan, spapr-vty, etc. devices are TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE, so I
>>>>> also tried that instead, but then the rng device suddenly shows up under
>>>>> /vdevice in the device tree - that's also not what we want, I guess.
>>>>
>>>> I did some more tests, and I think I can get this working with one small
>>>> modification to spapr_vio.c
>> ...
>>>> i.e. when the dt_name has not been set, the device won't be added to the
>>>> /vdevice device tree node. If that's acceptable, I'll continue with this
>>>> approach.
>>>
>>> A bit hacky.
>>>
>>> I think it would be preferable to build it under SysBus by default,
>>> like spapr-rtc. Properties can be set on the device using -global (or
>>> -set, but -global is easier).
>>
>> If anyhow possible, I'd prefere to use "-device" for this instead, because
>>
>> a) it's easier to use for the user, for example you can simply use
>> "-device spapr-rng,?" to get the list of properties - this
>> does not seem to work with spapr-rtc (it has a "date" property
>> which does not show up in the help text?)
>
> Actually, I don't think that's got anything to do with -device versus
> otherwise. "date" doesn't appear because it's an "object" property
> rather than a "qdev" property - that distinction is subtle and
> confusing, yes.
At least it is not very friendly for the user ... if a configuration
property does not show up in the help text, you've got to document it
somewhere else or nobody will be aware of it.
>> b) unlike the rtc device which is always instantiated, the rng
>> device is rather optional, so it is IMHO more intuitive if
>> created via the -device option.
>
> Hrm, that's true though. And.. we're back at the perrenial question
> of what "standard" devices should be constructed by default. And what
> "default" means.
>
> It seems to me that while the random device is optional, it should be
> created by default. But with -device there's not really a way to do
> that. But then again if it's constructed internally there's not
> really a way to turn it off short of hacky machine options. Ugh.
>
>> So I'd like to give it a try with the TYPE_VIO_SPAPR_DEVICE first ... if
>> you then still don't like the patches at all, I can still rework them to
>> use TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE instead.
>
> I still dislike putting it on the VIO "bus", since PAPR doesn't
> consider it a VIO device.
Hmm, that's also a valid point.
After doing some more research, I think I've found yet another
possibility (why isn't there a proper documentation/howto for all this
QOM stuff ... or did I just miss it?) :
Instead of using a bus, simply set parent = TYPE_DEVICE, so that it is a
"bus-less" device. Seems to work fine at a first glance, so unless
somebody tells me that this is a very bad idea, I'll try to rework my
patches accordingly...
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 18:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] ppc/spapr_hcall: Implement H_RANDOM hypercall Thomas Huth
2015-08-31 18:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] spapr: Add support for hwrng when available Thomas Huth
2015-09-01 0:38 ` David Gibson
2015-09-01 10:53 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-08 5:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Sam Bobroff
2015-09-08 5:15 ` David Gibson
2015-09-09 21:10 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-10 7:33 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-10 10:40 ` David Gibson
2015-09-10 12:03 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-10 12:13 ` Alexander Graf
2015-09-11 0:46 ` David Gibson
2015-09-11 9:43 ` Alexander Graf
2015-09-14 2:27 ` David Gibson
2015-09-14 7:36 ` Alexander Graf
2015-09-11 0:45 ` David Gibson
2015-09-11 7:30 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2015-09-14 2:25 ` David Gibson
2015-09-08 5:38 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-09 0:54 ` Sam Bobroff
2015-09-10 12:06 ` Greg Kurz
2015-09-09 14:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Greg Kurz
2015-08-31 18:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ppc/spapr_hcall: Implement H_RANDOM hypercall in QEMU Thomas Huth
2015-09-01 0:47 ` David Gibson
2015-09-01 11:03 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-07 15:05 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-08 1:14 ` David Gibson
2015-09-02 5:34 ` Amit Shah
2015-09-02 7:48 ` David Gibson
2015-09-02 8:58 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-02 10:06 ` Amit Shah
2015-09-02 10:02 ` Amit Shah
2015-09-03 1:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-03 2:17 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F28314.7070608@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).