From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: add some migration doc
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:47:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FA9A29.2040404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150917123931.11435cf6@bahia.local>
On 09/17/2015 06:39 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:06:01 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Try to cover the basics of virtio migration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> It might help if we add some documentation; at the very least, it will
>> prevent myself getting a headache everytime I look at that code :)
>>
>> Feedback welcome.
> Excellent ! This is a very good to start with.
>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Just a thought below...
>
>> ---
>> docs/virtio-migration.txt | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 docs/virtio-migration.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/virtio-migration.txt b/docs/virtio-migration.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..9c575e6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/docs/virtio-migration.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
>> +Virtio devices and migration
>> +============================
>> +
>> +Saving and restoring the state of virtio devices is a bit of a twisty maze,
>> +for several reasons:
>> +- state is distributed between several parts:
>> + - virtio core, for common fields like features, number of queues, ...
>> + - virtio transport (pci, ccw, ...), for the different proxy devices and
>> + transport specific state (msix vectors, indicators, ...)
>> + - virtio device (net, blk, ...), for the different device types and their
>> + state (mac address, request queue, ...)
>> +- most fields are saved via the stream interface; subsequently, subsections
>> + have been added to make cross-version migration possible
>> +
>> +This file attempts to document the current procedure and point out some
>> +caveats.
>> +
>> +
>> +Save state procedure
>> +====================
>> +
>> +virtio core virtio transport virtio device
>> +----------- ---------------- -------------
>> +
>> + save() function registered
>> + via register_savevm()
>> +virtio_save() <----------
>> + ------> save_config()
>> + - save proxy device
>> + - save transport-specific
>> + device fields
>> +- save common device
>> + fields
>> +- save common virtqueue
>> + fields
>> + ------> save_queue()
>> + - save transport-specific
>> + virtqueue fields
>> + ------> save_device()
>> + - save device-specific
>> + fields
>> +- save subsections
>> + - device endianness,
>> + if changed from
>> + default endianness
>> + - 64 bit features, if
>> + any high feature bit
>> + is set
>> + - virtio-1 virtqueue
>> + fields, if VERSION_1
>> + is set
>> +
>> +
>> +Load state procedure
>> +====================
>> +
>> +virtio core virtio transport virtio device
>> +----------- ---------------- -------------
>> +
>> + load() function registered
>> + via register_savevm()
>> +virtio_load() <----------
>> + ------> load_config()
>> + - load proxy device
>> + - load transport-specific
>> + device fields
>> +- load common device
>> + fields
>> +- load common virtqueue
>> + fields
>> + ------> load_queue()
>> + - load transport-specific
>> + virtqueue fields
>> +- notify guest
>> + ------> load_device()
>> + - load device-specific
>> + fields
>> +- load subsections
>> + - device endianness
>> + - 64 bit features
>> + - virtio-1 virtqueue
>> + fields
>> +- sanitize endianness
>> +- sanitize features
>> +- virtqueue index sanity
>> + check
>> + - feature-dependent setup
>> +
>> +
>> +Implications of this setup
>> +==========================
>> +
>> +Devices need to be careful in their state processing during load: The
>> +load_device() procedure is invoked by the core before subsections have
>> +been loaded. Any code that depends on information transmitted in subsections
>> +therefore has to be invoked in the device's load() function _after_
>> +virtio_load() returned (like e.g. code depending on features).
>> +
> From a VMState standpoint, such code would land in a post-load callback most of
> the time. Would that help comprehension if we introduce a virtio_post_load()
> function ?
I think we could. (With calling a device specific method in
virtio_post_load()).
>> +Any extension of the state being migrated should be done in subsections
>> +added to the core for compatibility reasons. If transport or device specific
>> +state is added, core needs to invoke a callback from the new subsection.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 8:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: unbreak self announcement and guest offloads after migration Jason Wang
2015-09-11 8:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-09-16 15:55 ` Greg Kurz
2015-09-17 9:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: add some migration doc Cornelia Huck
2015-09-17 10:39 ` Greg Kurz
2015-09-17 10:47 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-09-17 10:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-09-17 10:44 ` Jason Wang
2015-09-17 10:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-09-17 15:42 ` Eric Blake
2015-09-16 15:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: unbreak self announcement and guest offloads after migration Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FA9A29.2040404@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).