From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de,
bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFCv2 1/2] spapr: Remove unnecessary owner field from sPAPRDRConnector
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:53:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FAE204.8000403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150917155053.27212.55263@loki>
On 17/09/2015 17:50, Michael Roth wrote:
> We still need globals for RTAS lookups. I think QOM is our most
> mature/well-tested interface for managing inter-device
> relationships/lookups, but I can understand if using
> root_container/link<DRC> seems off. To me it seem like a nice
> "freebie" we get from using QOM, and gave us nice guarantees like
> globally unique paths to correspond to globally unique DRC indexes.
I think it's okay; but I don't really like looking at ->properties
directly, without an API (which doesn't exist indeed).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 1:41 [Qemu-devel] [RFCv2 0/2] spapr: Cleanups to dynamic reconfiguration mechanism David Gibson
2015-09-14 1:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFCv2 1/2] spapr: Remove unnecessary owner field from sPAPRDRConnector David Gibson
2015-09-14 6:23 ` Bharata B Rao
2015-09-14 8:22 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-09-14 11:45 ` David Gibson
2015-09-14 12:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-14 14:06 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-09-14 14:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-16 3:16 ` David Gibson
2015-09-17 15:50 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-17 15:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-09-17 23:03 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-17 15:01 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-15 0:31 ` David Gibson
2015-09-15 0:30 ` David Gibson
2015-09-15 11:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-14 1:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFCv2 2/2] spapr: Don't use QOM [*] syntax for DR connectors David Gibson
2015-09-14 4:07 ` Bharata B Rao
2015-09-14 4:14 ` David Gibson
2015-09-14 4:41 ` Bharata B Rao
2015-09-14 5:20 ` David Gibson
2015-09-14 8:13 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-09-15 4:03 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-15 4:21 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-16 3:18 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FAE204.8000403@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).