From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdlGO-0008DN-DY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:31:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdlGK-0004wB-Du for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:31:08 -0400 References: <1442259039-22137-1-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> From: Alexander Graf Message-ID: <55FF1785.6070801@suse.de> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:31:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1442259039-22137-1-git-send-email-mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] target-ppc migration fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Cave-Ayland , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, "david@gibson.dropbear.id.au" On 14.09.15 21:30, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > Whilst trying to fix migration of g3beige/mac99 images I came up with the > following patchset. The first patch is really cosmetic, while the second patch > alters the migration stream to include internal CPU IRQ state which appears > to fix an issue where images randomly fail to resume after migration. > > As the second patch would need more work if deemed correct (the change in > migration stream would require a bump in version number), it seemed worth > putting this out for review in case this is actually the symptom of another > bug. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland David, when a non-RFC version of this patch comes around, could you please review and if good apply it to the tree via your branch? Thanks a bunch! Alex