From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeKeg-0002uz-Ew for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:18:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeKeF-0007ce-8q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:18:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:35142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeKeE-0007b3-Vf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:18:07 -0400 Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so154001824wic.0 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <87mw8rumhb.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <87y4s8h5rh.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <876132olyi.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20150922100609.GI28888@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56012ADA.8050400@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:18:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150922100609.GI28888@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] MAINTAINERS leaves too many files uncovered List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" , Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel On 22/09/2015 12:06, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > We could extend the checkpatch.pl script so that it reports an error > if the patch contains a new file which is not covered by MAINTAINERS. > That would immediately prevent the situation getting any worse. Actually Linux has such a check. Any volunteer to backport it? :) Paolo