From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSov-0004e7-Uo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:01:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSos-0002kb-PW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:01:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeSos-0002kO-L7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:01:38 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6C6A37E2 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:01:37 +0000 (UTC) References: <1442939759-9862-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <560199E7.6020401@redhat.com> <56019DB9.3020804@redhat.com> <5601A34A.3050606@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <5601A58F.9020009@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:01:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5601A34A.3050606@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docs: describe the QEMU build system structure / design List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , John Snow Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/22/15 20:51, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/22/2015 12:28 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> meta review of your review: >> > >> >>>> +Each system/userspace emulation target needs to have a slightly >>>> +different set of make rules / variables. Thus, make will be recursively >>>> +invoked for each of the emulation targets. >>>> + >>>> +The recursive invokation will end up processing the toplevel >>> >>> invocation again. >> >> Self-contradictory period again! :) >> >>> Thanks for writing this! > > Heartily seconded - in spite of our review comments, the document looks > very useful. > >> >> Yes! >> >>> Pretending to be Eric, >> >> Yes. :) > > Don't know if I should be pleased or shocked :) Pleased, certainly. :) Laszlo